Kelly and Sale: Persuasive Or Pointless? Essay -- Kelly Sale Argumenta

Kelly and cut-rate sale Persuasive Or Pointless? Unarguably, since technology has been introduced, it has had profound effect, pervade not only onto society, but our entire ecological system. To categorize the effects of technology as predominantly beneficial or detrimental, as Kevin Kelly and Kirkpatrick Sale claim in their interview, is difficult. Interview With The Luddite captures and vividly illustrates their seemingly pointless and develop ideas. Kelly, protechnology, and Sale, a contemporary neo-Luddite, discuss many technological issues, including the automation of the ride force, oral tradition, literacy, and civilization. Later, they go on to present often radical and phantasmagorical solutions to the issues. While at times I can interpenetrate accredited aspects of the arguments, their solutions are predominantly too idealistic. In this paper, I plan to seek the physical setting of the interview, important nonphysical aspects including the intentions of the particip ants, and the ideas presented, while incorporating my own perceptions of their potency and effectiveness. The atmosphere of the June 1995 interview between Kelly and Sale is of essential importance to the initial impressions of the audience. Firstly, Kelly and Sale agreed to the interview which was published in Wired magazine. This frequent on-line magazine lacks any in-depth discussion of even the most moot issues surrounding digital culture (243). Obviously, the magazine offers a purely slanting perspective and presents only the positive effects of technological innovations. Appearing in such a biased magazine may seem ab initio beneficial to the conversion intentions of Sale, the Luddite, but with deeper analysis it becomes clear that the c... ... convincing. Still, I cannot fathom the motivations behind the interview for either participant. Perhaps Kellys goal was to persuade Sale, which he did, and perhaps Sales goal was to attract publicity. Nevertheless, neither was ver y effective or intriguing in their arguments. I propose we invite technology and essentially the future. But we should never overstep our boundaries in this world. Instead, accept our role, have imply for nature, respect the Higher Being, and finally consider the consequences of our actions. If all aspects are considered, the rudimentary and seemingly pointless analogies illustrated by Kelly and Sale can be thankfully avoided. Works CitedKelly, Kevin. Interview With The Luddite. Andrea A.Lunsford and John J. Ruszkiewicz, The Presence Of Others Voices That Call For A Response. unsanded York St. Martins Press, 1997. (243-253)