Describing how the civilizations were similar and how they differed Essay

Describing how the elaborations were similar and how they differed - Essay ExampleThe civilizations ext give the axeed and some areas developed dependently and together while the Chinese civilization developed independently (Schirokauer et.al 24). Although there was some influence on the Wests cultures. In just about cases, the Chines growing occurred in the sections known as the dynasties. The dynasties were divided into three categories namely, early dynasty, imperial dynasties and end of ancient china.The Qin dynasty was established as a type of China civilization dynasties by Shi Huangti. The Qin dynasty can be also referred to as the China era. Shi conducted the wall destruction and established the Great Wall of China (Schirokauer et.al 48). He also made travelling easy by building roads to improve the infrastructure of China. He fairly ruled the people and distributed lands. He also expanded his empire and its boundaries (Schirokauer et.al 48). All this and among others are the development of civilization in the empire of Qin dynasty.The empire of Persian developed civilization in terms of unblemished civilization. The classical development of civilization in the Persian Empire. Succeed due to the cooperation of leaders in the empire. several(prenominal) areas of economic activities were taxed 20 percent. Such activities are like religious institution, manufacturing and agriculture among others. The activities were the cause civilization development.Finally, civilization in the Empire of Macedon. The civilization development started in the year 1913. In this empire, the Greek community was provide and the stabilization of the area. Unlike other empires, Macedon has developed its civilization through development of the area. The mentioned empires above having their differences and similarities. In most cases, development in all the empires influenced the economic development of the area. On the other hand, each empire had a different style of developi ng